If you’re a product designer, ingegnere, or entrepreneur gearing up for prototype development, one of the first and most critical questions you’ll face is: What materials can be used for prototype processing? The right material choice directly impacts your prototype’s functionality, durata, costo, and even how well it represents the final product. In questa guida, we’ll break down all common prototype materials—from metals to plastics and beyond—explain their key properties, Casi d'uso ideali, and processing tips, so you can make an informed decision for your project.
Why Material Choice Matters for Prototype Processing
Before diving into specific materials, let’s clarify why this decision is so important. A prototype isn’t just a “test piece”—it’s a tool to validate design, prestazioni di prova, and showcase your product to stakeholders. The wrong material can lead to:
- Inaccurate performance tests: Per esempio, using a weak plastic for a structural part prototype won’t reflect how the final metal version will hold up.
- Wasted time and money: If a material is too hard to machine or doesn’t meet your project’s needs, you’ll have to restart the prototype process.
- Poor stakeholder perception: A low-quality prototype (PER ESEMPIO., a brittle plastic that cracks easily) can undermine confidence in your design.
That’s why understanding the pros, cons, and best uses of each material is essential. Sotto, we’ll cover the three main categories of prototype materials: metal alloys, acciaio inossidabile, E plastica—plus special materials for unique needs.
Leghe di metallo: Strong and Durable Prototype Materials
Metal alloys are a top choice for prototypes that need strength, durezza, or resistance to wear. They’re commonly used for industrial parts, componenti automobilistici, and structural prototypes. Let’s break down the most popular metal alloys for prototype processing, their properties, e applicazioni ideali.
Metal Alloy Type | Common Grades | Proprietà chiave | Processing Method (CNC/3D Printing) | Opzioni di trattamento superficiale | Ideal Prototype Use Cases |
Aluminum Alloys | 2024, 6061, 6063, 6082, 7075, ADC12 | Leggero (density: 2.7 g/cm³), good strength, corrosion-resistant | MACCHING CNC (più comune); 3D Printing (for complex shapes) | Sabbiatura, Anodizzante, pittura | Aerospace parts, staffe automobilistiche, electronic enclosures |
Bronze | C51000, C54400 | High ductility, good electrical conductivity | MACCHING CNC | Lucidare, plating | Connettori elettrici, parti decorative |
Ottone | C26000 (Cartridge Brass) | Machinable, corrosion-resistant, golden appearance | MACCHING CNC | Lucidare, lacquering | Decorative prototypes, hardware components |
Copper | Electrolytic Copper (C11000) | Excellent electrical conductivity, malleable | MACCHING CNC, 3D Printing (metallo) | Lucidare, tin plating | Heat sinks, electrical prototypes |
Titanium Alloy | Ti-6al-4v | Rapporto elevato di forza-peso, corrosion-resistant (even in saltwater) | MACCHING CNC (slow, due to hardness); 3D Printing | Anodizing, passivation | Dispositivi medici, aerospace components |
Lega di magnesio | AZ31B, AZ91D | Ultra-lightweight (density: 1.8 g/cm³), good stiffness | MACCHING CNC | Chemical conversion coating | Lightweight automotive parts, Elettronica di consumo |
Zinc Alloy | ZA-8, ZA-12 | Low melting point, facile da lanciare | Die Casting (for small batches), MACCHING CNC | Chromate conversion coating | Toy prototypes, Piccole parti strutturali |
Key Notes on Aluminum Alloys
Aluminum alloys are the most widely used metal materials for prototypes—and for good reason. Grades like 6061 E 6063 are easy to machine (CNC machining can finish a 6061 prototype in 1–3 days) and offer a great balance of strength and cost. 7075 aluminum is stronger (used for high-stress parts) but slightly harder to machine, so it may add 1–2 days to your prototype lead time.
Dopo la lavorazione, aluminum prototypes are often sandblasted to remove tool marks and anodized (a process that adds a protective oxide layer) to improve surface quality and durability. Anodizing also lets you add color (PER ESEMPIO., nero, argento, blu) to your prototype—perfect for presentation.
Acciaio inossidabile: High-Strength and Corrosion-Resistant
Stainless steel is a subset of steel that contains chromium (at least 10.5%), which gives it excellent corrosion resistance. It’s ideal for prototypes that will be exposed to moisture, prodotti chimici, or high temperatures. Below are the most common stainless steel types for prototypes.
Stainless Steel Type | Common Grades | Proprietà chiave | Machinabilità (1=Easy, 5=Hard) | Magnetic? | Ideal Prototype Use Cases |
Austenitic (Most Common) | 304, 316 | Non-magnetic, high corrosion resistance, ductile | 3 (Moderare) | NO | Food processing equipment, medical tools, marine parts |
Ferritic | 409, 430 | Magnetic, good corrosion resistance, lower cost | 2 (Facile) | SÌ | Automotive exhaust parts, elettrodomestici |
Martensitic | 410, 420 | Magnetic, hardenable (via heat treatment), alta resistenza | 4 (Hard) | SÌ | Cutting tools, valvole, high-stress mechanical parts |
Galvanized Steel | G90, G60 | Zinc-coated (prevents rust), basso costo | 2 (Facile) | SÌ | Outdoor prototypes, structural brackets |
Mild Steel (Low Carbon Steel) | 1018, 1020 | Basso costo, Facile da macchina, good weldability | 1 (Facile) | SÌ | Basic structural prototypes, parentesi |
Perché 304 E 316 Stainless Steel Are Top Choices
304 acciaio inossidabile is the most popular for prototypes—it’s affordable, Facile da macchina, and works for most non-extreme environments. 316 acciaio inossidabile is more corrosion-resistant (thanks to added molybdenum) but costs 20–30% more. It’s worth the extra cost for prototypes that will be exposed to saltwater (PER ESEMPIO., marine parts) or chemicals (PER ESEMPIO., laboratory equipment).
One unique benefit of stainless steel is its magnetic absorption (for ferritic and martensitic grades). This makes it ideal for prototypes that need to attach to magnetic surfaces—like a tool prototype that needs to stick to a workshop magnet board.
Plastic Materials: Versatile and Cost-Effective for Prototypes
Plastics are the most versatile prototype materials—they come in a wide range of hardness, flessibilità, trasparenza, and heat resistance. They’re perfect for consumer products, elettronica, dispositivi medici, and prototypes where weight or cost is a concern. Let’s break down the most common plastics for prototype processing, plus when to choose 3D printing vs. MACCHING CNC.
Common Plastic Materials for Prototypes
Plastic Type | Common Grades/Variants | Proprietà chiave | Processing Suitability (3D Printing/CNC) | Resistenza alla temperatura (Max) | Ideal Prototype Use Cases |
Addominali | Standard ABS, High-Temperature ABS | Resistente all'impatto, Facile da macchina, basso costo | MACCHING CNC (excellent); 3D Printing (FDM) | 80–100°C | Consumer electronics enclosures, toy prototypes |
Pp (Polipropilene) | PP Homo, PP Copolymer | Chemical-resistant, flessibile, leggero | MACCHING CNC; 3D Printing (FDM) | 100–120°C | Contenitori di cibo, Alloggi per dispositivi medici |
PC (Policarbonato) | Lexan (brand name) | Elevata forza di impatto, trasparente, resistente al calore | MACCHING CNC; 3D Printing (SLA/FDM) | 120–135°C | Safety goggles, electronic display covers |
PMMA (Acrilico) | Plexiglas (brand name) | Trasparente (92% trasmissione leggera), resistente ai graffi | MACCHING CNC; 3D Printing (SLA) | 80–90°C | Display cases, transparent prototypes |
Pom (Acetale) | Delrin (brand name) | Low friction, high stiffness, resistente all'usura | MACCHING CNC | 100–110°C | Marcia, cuscinetti, mechanical components |
PU (Polyurethane) | Domestic PU, Imported PU, Transparent PU, Soft PU | Flessibile (Shore hardness: 30A–90D), durevole | 3D Printing (SLA for soft variants); MACCHING CNC (for rigid variants) | 80–100°C | Cushioned parts, impugnature, flexible enclosures |
Silicone | Translucent 905, 918; Transparent T-4, 8678 | Resistente al calore, flessibile, biocompatibile | 3D Printing (SLA); Mold Casting | 200–250 ° C. | Medical seals, guarnizioni, flexible prototypes |
3D Printing Vs. CNC Machining for Plastic Prototypes
When should you use 3D printing vs. CNC machining for plastic prototypes? It depends on your batch size, precision needs, and design complexity:
- 3D Printing: Best for 1–5 unit prototypes with complex shapes (PER ESEMPIO., Strutture reticolari, sottosquadri). It’s faster for small batches (1–2 giorni) and doesn’t require expensive tooling. Tuttavia, 3D printed plastics may have slightly lower precision (tolleranza: ± 0,1 mm) Rispetto alla lavorazione del CNC.
- MACCHING CNC: Ideale per piccoli lotti (5–50 unità) that need high precision (tolleranza: ± 0,05 mm) or better mechanical properties. CNC machined plastics have smoother surfaces (less post-processing needed) and are more durable for functional tests. The downside? It takes longer (3–5 giorni) and costs more for very complex designs.
Special Materials for Unique Prototype Needs
While metal alloys, acciaio inossidabile, and plastics cover most prototype needs, some projects require special materials. These are used when the final product will operate in extreme conditions (PER ESEMPIO., alto calore, prodotti chimici) or has unique requirements (PER ESEMPIO., biocompatibilità). Examples include:
- Special Alloys: Incontro (for high-temperature aerospace parts), Hastelloy (for chemical resistance), and Titanium Grade 23 (biocompatible for medical implants). These are more expensive and harder to machine but essential for specialized prototypes.
- High-Performance Plastics: SBIRCIARE (polyetheretherketone) – heat-resistant (max temp: 260° C.) and biocompatible, used for medical and aerospace prototypes; PTFE (Teflon) – non-stick and chemical-resistant, used for lab equipment prototypes.
- Composite Materials: Carbon fiber-reinforced plastics (Cfrp) – lightweight and ultra-strong, used for high-performance prototypes like racing car parts or drone frames.
How to Choose the Right Material for Your Prototype
With so many options, how do you pick the best material for your project? Follow these four steps:
- Define Your Prototype’s Purpose:
- Is it for visual presentation (PER ESEMPIO., a client demo)? Prioritize materials with a nice finish (PER ESEMPIO., polished brass, transparent PMMA).
- Is it for Test funzionali (PER ESEMPIO., stress tests)? Choose a material with properties matching the final product (PER ESEMPIO., 6061 aluminum for a structural part that will be aluminum in production).
- Is it for environmental testing (PER ESEMPIO., moisture resistance)? Pick corrosion-resistant materials (PER ESEMPIO., 316 acciaio inossidabile, PP plastic).
- Consider Mechanical Property Requirements:
- Need strength? Go for 7075 aluminum or 304 acciaio inossidabile.
- Need flexibility? Choose soft PU or silicone.
- Need transparency? Opt for PMMA or transparent PC.
- Set a Cost Budget:
- Low budget: Plastica addominali, mild steel, O 6063 alluminio.
- Mid budget: 6061 alluminio, 304 acciaio inossidabile, or PC plastic.
- High budget: Titanium alloy, 316 acciaio inossidabile, or PEEK plastic.
- Check Processing Feasibility:
- If your design has complex curves or undercuts, 3D Printing (with plastic or metal) may be the only option.
- If you need high precision, CNC machining is better than 3D printing for most materials.
Yigu Technology’s Perspective on Prototype Material Selection
Alla tecnologia Yigu, we believe prototype material selection is a collaborative process—we don’t just “supply materials” but help clients match materials to their goals. Our team: 1) Provides material samples (PER ESEMPIO., 6061 alluminio, 304 acciaio inossidabile, Addominali) so clients can test feel and finish; 2) Recommends cost-effective alternatives (PER ESEMPIO., 6061 instead of 7075 if strength needs are moderate); 3) Optimizes processing (CNC/3D printing) for each material to cut lead time by 15–20%. We prioritize transparency—sharing material costs, machining challenges, and performance trade-offs upfront to avoid rework. For most projects, we help clients narrow down 2–3 ideal materials in 1–2 days.
FAQ:
1. Can I use a different material for my prototype than the final product?
SÌ, but only if it doesn’t affect your prototype’s purpose. Per esempio, using ABS plastic for a visual prototype of a metal part is fine—since you’re only showcasing the design. But for functional testing (PER ESEMPIO., stress or heat tests), the prototype material should match the final product’s key properties (PER ESEMPIO., forza, Resistenza al calore) to get accurate results.
2. Which is more cost-effective: metal or plastic prototypes?
Plastic prototypes are usually cheaper—ABS or PP plastic costs 30–50% less than aluminum or stainless steel. They also require less machining time (faster turnaround) and lower post-processing costs. Tuttavia, if your prototype needs strength (PER ESEMPIO., a structural part), metal may be worth the extra cost to avoid testing failures.
3. How do I know if a material is suitable for 3D printing vs. MACCHING CNC?
Check two things: 1) Design complexity: If your prototype has undercuts, Strutture reticolari, o canali interni, 3D printing is better (CNC can’t reach these areas easily). 2) Batch size: For 1–5 units, 3D printing is faster and cheaper. Per 5+ unità, CNC machining is more cost-effective (it has higher per-unit speed once set up). Most plastics and some metals (alluminio, titanio) work for both methods—ask your manufacturer for guidance if you’re unsure.