FDM (Moulage par dépôt fondu) et SLA (Moulage photopolymérisable) are two mainstream 3D printing technologies, chacun adapté aux besoins distincts du projet : l'un pour les pièces fonctionnelles rentables et l'autre pour les pièces de haute précision, modèles détaillés. Comprendre leurs différences est essentiel pour choisir le bon processus, si vous réalisez des prototypes mécaniques, modèles médicaux, ou afficher des éléments. Cet article décompose core differences between FDM and SLA printing processes across 6 key areas, plus practical guidance on when to use each.
1. Core Difference: Working Principle (Material Extrusion vs. Resin Curing)
The fundamental divide between FDM and SLA lies in how they build parts—a contrast that shapes every other aspect of their performance, from material options to surface quality.
| Processus | Working Principle | Comment ça marche | Simple Analogy |
| FDM (Moulage par dépôt fondu) | Extrusion thermoplastique | Uses a heated nozzle to melt thermoplastic materials (par ex., PLA, ABS). The nozzle moves along a preset 3D model path, depositing molten material layer by layer on a build platform. The material cools and solidifies quickly to form the final part. | Squeezing toothpaste from a tube: The heated nozzle acts like a toothpaste tube, extruding material in controlled lines to build a shape layer by layer. |
| ANS (Moulage photopolymérisable) | UV Light Resin Curing | Uses a UV laser or light source to cure liquid photosensitive resin. The light source precisely targets and hardens specific areas of the resin surface according to slice data. The build platform gradually lifts to create space for the next layer, repeating until the part is complete. | Hardening gel with sunlight: The liquid resin is like UV-sensitive gel, which solidifies into a solid shape when exposed to targeted UV light. |
2. Side-by-Side Comparison: FDM vs. SLA Printing Processes
To quickly evaluate which process fits your needs, use this comprehensive table comparing their materials, précision, coût, et plus.
| Comparison Category | FDM (Moulage par dépôt fondu) | ANS (Moulage photopolymérisable) | Key Takeaway |
| Propriétés des matériaux | – Espèces: Supports a wide range of thermoplastics (PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU) and mixed materials (carbon fiber-filled, wood-filled).- Coût: Low consumable cost (à propos \(12–)15/kilos).- Résistance mécanique: Haute résistance; suitable for functional parts, but anisotropic (weak interlayer bonding). | – Espèces: Limited to photosensitive resins (standard, haute température, biocompatible); few color options.- Coût: High resin cost (à propos \(75–)120/liter); frequent replacement of consumables (LCD screens, resin tanks) adds expense.- Résistance mécanique: Fragile (ordinary resin); not ideal for mechanical stress, but engineering-grade resin improves durability. | FDM offers diverse, low-cost materials; SLA uses specialized resins for precision, not strength. |
| Précision & Qualité des surfaces | – Précision: Layer thickness ranges from 0.05–0.3mm, limited by nozzle size and movement precision. Tolerances are relatively loose (±0,1–0,3 mm).- Qualité des surfaces: Obvious layer lines; rough surface needs sanding or chemical polishing to improve. Complex details (parois minces, sharp edges) often blur. | – Précision: Layer thickness as low as 0.02–0.05mm; laser/projection resolution reaches micron level. Tolerances are tight (±0,025 mm).- Qualité des surfaces: Lisse, delicate finish (close to injection-molded parts); no additional sanding needed. Complex details and small features are clearly preserved. | SLA delivers industrial-grade precision and surface quality; FDM prioritizes functionality over finesse. |
| Équipement & Operating Costs | – Equipment Price: Entry-level models cost as low as \(150–)300; industrial-grade equipment is moderately priced (\(5,000–)50,000). Easy to maintain. – Operating Costs: Low replacement costs for consumables (filaments, buses); no extra tools required for basic use. | – Equipment Price: Desktop models cost \(1,000–)5,000; industrial-grade equipment is expensive (\(20,000–)1,000,000+). Light sources and LCD screens wear out quickly. – Operating Costs: High additional expenses (résines, isopropyl alcohol for cleaning, post-curing equipment); resin tanks need regular replacement. | FDM is budget-friendly for long-term use; SLA requires higher upfront and ongoing investment. |
| Production Speed | – Vitesse: Faster for large, pièces simples. A 10cm cubic PLA part takes 2–4 hours. – Limitation: Speed decreases with complex geometries (due to frequent nozzle movement changes). | – Vitesse: Slower for most parts. A 10cm cubic resin part takes 3–6 hours (due to precise light targeting). – Limitation: Speed is less affected by complexity but tied to layer count (more layers = longer time). | FDM is faster for large, simple functional parts; SLA is slower but consistent for detailed models. |
| Post-Treatment Requirements | – Mesures: Manual removal of support structures; ponçage, filing, or chemical polishing to smooth layer lines. Process is simple but time-consuming. – Safety: No toxic materials; no special protective gear needed (except when handling ABS, which emits mild fumes). | – Mesures: Rinse with isopropyl alcohol to remove residual resin; post-UV curing to enhance part strength. Must wear protective gloves to avoid skin contact with resin. – Waste Disposal: Need to handle waste resin and cleaning liquid carefully to ensure environmental protection. | FDM post-treatment is labor-intensive but safe; SLA post-treatment is more technical and requires safety precautions. |
| Application Scenarios | – Ideal Uses: Prototypes fonctionnels (composants mécaniques), modèles éducatifs, large-size parts (pièces automobiles), low-cost low-volume production. – Avantages: Diverse materials, pièces durables, suitable for outdoor or high-durability needs. | – Ideal Uses: High-precision models (couronnes dentaires, bijoux), implants médicaux, géométries complexes (intricate sculptures), transparent or dense components. – Avantages: Excellent surface finish, isotropy (consistent strength in all directions), suitable for display or mold making with strict detail requirements. | FDM serves functional, cost-sensitive projects; SLA dominates precision and detail-focused applications. |
3. When to Choose FDM vs. SLA Printing Process? (Guide étape par étape)
Use this linear, question-driven process to align the process with your project goals:
Étape 1: Define Budget & Cost Priorities
- Tight budget or low-cost needs: Choisir FDM. Par exemple, si tu as besoin 50 PLA mechanical prototypes, FDM’s low filament cost (\(12–)15/kilos) keeps total expenses down.
- Willing to invest in precision: Choisir ANS. Par exemple, dental models requiring ±0.025mm tolerance justify SLA’s higher resin and equipment costs.
Étape 2: Evaluate Part Function & Strength Needs
- Functional parts or mechanical components: Utiliser FDM. Its thermoplastics (par ex., ABS, PETG) have high strength, making them suitable for parts that need to withstand stress (par ex., robot arms, poignées d'outils).
- Non-functional display models or precision parts: Utiliser ANS. Its smooth finish and detail preservation work for items like jewelry prototypes or medical teaching models.
Étape 3: Consider Timeline & Post-Treatment Effort
- Fast turnaround or minimal post-treatment time: Optez pour ANS if precision is key (no sanding needed). Choisir FDM if you can accept sanding to save cost (FDM prints faster for large parts).
- Complex details or tight tolerances: Prioritize ANS (par ex., small thin walls <0.5mm). For simple shapes (par ex., large storage bins), FDM is more efficient.
4. Yigu Technology’s Perspective on FDM vs. SLA Printing Processes
Chez Yigu Technologie, we see FDM and SLA as complementary, not competitive. Many clients mistakenly choose SLA for functional parts (wasting money on brittle resin) or FDM for high-precision models (compromising detail). We recommend combining both: Utiliser ANS for initial prototyping (to validate design details and surface quality) et FDM for functional testing or mass production (to leverage durable, low-cost thermoplastics). For clients with mixed needs (par ex., a part needing both detail and strength), we also offer hybrid solutions—using SLA for detailed components and FDM for structural parts, then assembling them. This approach balances precision, coût, et fonctionnalité, ensuring every project meets its goals without unnecessary trade-offs.
FAQ: Common Questions About FDM and SLA Printing Processes
- Q: Can FDM produce parts with the same surface quality as SLA?
UN: Non. Even with extensive post-processing (ponçage, polissage), FDM parts still have subtle layer lines. SLA’s resin curing process creates a naturally smooth surface that FDM cannot match—making SLA better for display or precision-critical parts.
- Q: Is SLA resin safe to use, especially for medical or food-contact parts?
UN: Ordinary SLA resin is not safe for food contact (it may leach chemicals). Cependant, biocompatible SLA resin (Approuvé par la FDA) is suitable for medical parts (par ex., modèles dentaires, implants temporaires). Always check resin specifications—never use standard resin for food or medical applications.
- Q: Which process is better for large-size parts (par ex., 50cm+ auto components)?
UN: FDM is better. SLA build platforms are typically smaller (most desktop models <30cm), and large SLA parts require more resin (increasing cost) and longer curing times. FDM has larger build volumes and lower material costs, making it more practical for large-size functional parts.