Dans le monde du moulage par injection, la surface d'une pièce n'est pas seulement une question d'apparence : elle a un impact sur la fonctionnalité, attrait du client, and even mold design.IPS (Institut de l'industrie du plastique) etVDI (Association allemande des ingénieurs) les normes sont les deux guides les plus fiables pour obtenir des surfaces de pièces moulées par injection correctes. Whether you’re a designer aiming for a sleek mirror finish or a manufacturer needing a grippy matte texture, understanding these standards helps you avoid costly mistakes (like choosing the wrong polish for a food – safe part) and deliver products that meet client expectations.
Why Surface Treatment Matters for Injection Molded Parts
You might wonder: Why not just use the mold as – est? La vérité est, unprocessed mold surfaces lead to flawed parts—and missed opportunities. Here’s why surface treatment is non – negotiable:
1. Fixes Mold Imperfections
Most injection molds are made from aluminum or steel. Even tiny machine tool marks (from mold manufacturing) or minor scratches on the mold will show up on every injected part.
- Par exemple, a mold with 0.1mm deep tool marks will produce plastic parts with the exact same marks. If those parts are for a high – end electronics case, customers will reject them.
- Solution: Sandblasting or polishing the mold removes these marks. A small toy manufacturer once saved 20% of production costs by polishing their mold—they no longer had to discard parts with visible tool lines.
2. Balances Aesthetics and Cost
Polishing a mold to a mirror finish looks great, but it comes with a price: finer polishing means higher mold costs (jusqu'à 30% more) and longer lead times (adding 1–2 weeks to mold production).
- Practical Choice: For hidden parts (like the inside of a washing machine), low – level polishing (par ex., SPI C – 3) is enough—tool marks won’t be seen and won’t affect function.
- For visible parts (like a smartphone back cover), un sommet – level polish (par ex., SPI A – 1) is worth the investment—it makes the product feel premium.
3. Boosts Part Functionality
Surface texture isn’t just about appearance—it solves real problems:
- Better Adhesion: A matte texture (par ex., VDI 21) helps paint or labels stick. A furniture brand switched from a smooth SPI B – 1 finish to VDI 21 for their plastic chair armrests, and label peeling dropped by 80%.
- Easier Gripping: Textured surfaces (par ex., SPI D – 2) prevent slipping. A tool manufacturer used SPI D – 2 for their plastic tool handles, and customer complaints about slippery grips fell by 90%.
- Air Release: Well – designed textures help air escape from the mold during injection. This avoids “air traps” (bubbles or gaps in the part). A medical device maker added a VDI 18 texture to their syringe mold, eliminating air traps that had caused 5% of syringes to be defective.
Key Factors That Shape Injection Mold Surface Finish
Unlike machining or 3D printing (where surface treatment happensaprès the part is made), injection molding’s surface finish is determined by the mold itself. Two factors control the final result:
1. Mold Surface Treatment
The mold’s surface—whether polished, sablé, or textured—directly transfers to the part. If you want a matte part, you need a matte – textured mold. Par exemple:
- To make a matte plastic cup, the mold’s inner surface is sandblasted (per SPI D – 1). Every cup made from that mold will have the same matte finish.
- A mistake here is costly: A company once polished a mold to SPI A – 1 (finition miroir) but needed a matte part. They had to re – sandblast the mold, ajout $1,500 and a week of delay.
2. Compatibilité des matériaux
Not all plastics work with every surface finish. Par exemple:
- Acrylique takes mirror finishes (SPI A – 1) beautifully—its clear, hard surface shows off the polish.
- TPU (a flexible plastic) is better for matte textures (SPI D – 3)—polishing it to a high shine is hard, and the finish wears off quickly.
The tables in the next sections (SPI and VDI) list which materials work with each finish to help you avoid this mistake.
Deep Dive into SPI Surface Finish Standards
LeSPI standard (from the Plastics Industry Institute) is widely used in North America and Asia. It ranks finishes from ultra – lisse (miroir) to matte, with clear guidelines on tools, roughness, and material use.
SPI Surface Finish Table
| SPI Polishing Level | Tools Used | But | Rugosité de la surface (Ra μm) | Compatible Materials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UN – 1 | 3#, 6000 grit diamond paste | Finition miroir (highest shine) | 0.012 – 0.025 | Acrylique |
| UN – 2 | 6#, 3000 grit diamond paste | Finition miroir | 0.025 – 0.05 | Acrylique, PC (Polycarbonate) |
| UN – 3 | 12#, 1200 grit diamond paste | High polish (near – miroir) | 0.05 – 0.10 | ABS, Acrylique, PS (Polystyrène), Nylon, PC |
| B – 1 | 600# papier de verre | Medium polish | 0.05 – 0.10 | ABS, Acrylique, PP (Polypropylène), PS, PEHD, Nylon, PC |
| B – 2 | 400# papier de verre | Medium polish | 0.10 – 0.15 | ABS, Acrylique, PP, PS, PEHD, Nylon, PC |
| B – 3 | 320# papier de verre | Moyen – low polish | 0.28 – 0.32 | ABS, Acrylique, PP, PS, PEHD, Nylon |
| C – 1 | 600 Whetstone | Low polish (basic smoothness) | 0.35 – 0.40 | ABS, Acrylique, PP, PS, PEHD, Nylon, TPU |
| C – 2 | 400 Whetstone | Low polish | 0.45 – 0.55 | ABS, Acrylique, PP, PS, PEHD, Nylon, TPU |
| C – 3 | 320 Whetstone | Low polish (minimal smoothing) | 0.63 – 0.70 | ABS, Acrylique, PP, PS, PEHD, Nylon, TPU |
| D – 1 | Sablage (coarse glass beads) | Finition mate (soft texture) | 0.80 – 1.00 | ABS, PP, PS, PEHD, Nylon, PC, TPU |
| D – 2 | #240 oxide sandblasting | Finition mate (slightly rougher) | 1.00 – 2.80 | ABS, PP, PS, PEHD, Nylon, TPU |
| D – 3 | #24 oxide sandblasting | Finition mate (roughest SPI) | 3.20 – 18 | ABS, PP, PS, PEHD, Nylon, TPU |
Réel – World SPI Example
A consumer electronics company needed a clear PC phone case with a mirror finish. They choseSPI A – 2 (3000 grit diamond paste) for the mold. Le résultat: The case had a sleek, reflective surface that matched the phone’s metal frame. Customers loved it, and sales of the case were 30% higher than their previous matte version.
Deep Dive into VDI Surface Finish Standards
LeVDI 3400 standard (from the German Engineering Association) is popular in Europe and global industrial markets. It’s especially useful for parts made with EDM (Usinage par électroérosion), but it also works with traditional polishing and sandblasting.
VDI Surface Finish Table
| VDI Parameter | Tools Used | But | Rugosité de la surface (Ra μm) | Key Use Cases |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 600 Whetstone | Low polish (basic smoothness) | 0.40 | Hidden parts (par ex., inside of a toaster) |
| 15 | 400 Whetstone | Low polish | 0.56 | Non – visible structural parts (par ex., plastic brackets) |
| 18 | Sablage (coarse glass beads) | Finition mate (soft texture) | 0.80 | Parts needing light grip (par ex., remote control bodies) |
| 21 | #24 Oxide Sandblasting | Finition mate (moderate grip) | 1.12 | Poignées d'outils, small appliance exteriors |
| 24 | #24 Oxide Sandblasting | Finition mate | 1.60 | Pièces de meubles (par ex., chair armrests) |
| 27 | #24 Oxide Sandblasting | Dull finish (strong grip) | 2.24 | Lourd – duty tool grips (par ex., power drill handles) |
| 30 | #24 Oxide Sandblasting | Dull finish | 3.15 | Industrial container lids (anti – slip) |
| 33 | #24 Oxide Sandblasting | Dull finish | 4.50 | Large machinery parts (par ex., tractor plastic panels) |
| 36 | #24 Oxide Sandblasting | Dull finish | 6.30 | Équipement extérieur (resistant to scratches) |
| 39 | #24 Oxide Sandblasting | Dull finish | 9.00 | Heavy industrial parts (par ex., construction machine components) |
| 42 | #24 Oxide Sandblasting | Dull finish | 12.50 | Haut – wear parts (par ex., conveyor belt guides) |
| 45 | #24 Oxide Sandblasting | Dull finish (roughest VDI) | 18.00 | Parts needing maximum grip (par ex., safety glove clips) |
Réel – World VDI Example
A European automotive supplier needed a plastic grip for a car’s emergency brake. They choseVDI 27 (#24 oxide sandblasting) for the mold. The texture was rough enough to provide a secure grip (even with wet hands) but not so rough that it damaged gloves. The supplier reported zero customer complaints about the grip over 2 années.
SPI vs. VDI: How to Choose the Right Standard
Choosing between SPI and VDI often comes down to your location, industrie, and part needs. Here’s a simple comparison to help you decide:
| Facteur | SPI Standard | VDI Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Regional Use | North America, Asie | Europe, global industrial markets |
| Idéal pour | Produits de consommation (par ex., électronique, jouets) | Pièces industrielles, GED – made components |
| Surface Range | Miroir (UN – 1) to rough matte (D – 3) | Low polish (12) to very rough (45) |
| Roughness Match | SPI C – 1 (0.35–0.40 μm) ≈ VDI 12 (0.40 µm) | SPI D – 1 (0.80–1.00 μm) ≈ VDI 18 (0.80 µm) |
Pro Tip
If you work with global clients, ask their preference. Par exemple:
- Un États-Unis. client may specify SPI A – 2 for a cosmetic container.
- A German client may ask for VDI 24 for the same type of container.
Yigu Technology’s Perspective on Injection Mold Surface Treatment
Chez Yigu Technologie, we see SPI and VDI standards as essential tools for delivering consistent, haut – quality injection molded parts. They eliminate guesswork—whether our clients need a mirror – smooth acrylic lens (SPI A – 1) or a grippy TPU handle (VDI 27). We’ve helped clients cut costs by matching finishes to part needs: Par exemple, using SPI C – 3 instead of B – 1 for hidden parts saved one client 15% sur les coûts de moule. As injection molding evolves, we’ll keep leveraging these standards to balance aesthetics, fonctionnalité, and affordability for our global customers.
FAQ
- Can I use SPI A – 1 (finition miroir) for TPU parts?
Non, TPU (a flexible plastic) isn’t ideal for SPI A – 1. It’s hard to polish TPU to a mirror shine, and the finish will wear off quickly with use. For TPU, choose a matte finish like SPI D – 2 or D – 3—they’re easier to achieve and more durable. - How do I know if I should use SPI or VDI for my project?
Start with your client’s location and industry. If your client is in the U.S. or makes consumer products (par ex., phones, jouets), use SPI. If they’re in Europe or make industrial parts (par ex., composants de machines), use VDI. Si vous n'êtes pas sûr, ask—most clients will have a preference based on their market. - Does a higher – level polish (par ex., SPI A – 1) always mean a better part?
Non, it depends on the part’s purpose. A mirror finish (SPI A – 1) is great for visible parts like a laptop cover, but it’s a waste of money for hidden parts like a printer’s internal bracket. For hidden parts, a low – level polish (par ex., SPI C – 2) is enough—it’s cheaper and faster to produce, and it won’t affect the part’s function.