TPU (Thermoplastisches Polyurethan) Und Silikon are two versatile elastomeric materials, but their unique chemical structures, processing methods, and performance traits make them suited to distinct applications—from consumer electronics to medical devices. Understanding their differences is critical to avoiding costly material mismatches (Z.B., using TPU for high-temperature seals or silicone for load-bearing parts). This article breaks down their disparities across 7 core dimensions, with clear comparisons, umsetzbare Daten, and real-world examples to help you select the right material for your project.
1. Chemische Struktur & Kerneigenschaften
The fundamental difference between TPU and silicone lies in their molecular makeup, which drives all other performance variations:
| Aspekt | TPU (Thermoplastisches Polyurethan) | Silikon |
| Backbone Composition | Hydrocarbon-based (ester or ether linkages) with alternating hard and soft segments. | Inorganic-organic hybrid (siloxane backbone: Si–O–Si bonds) with organic side chains (Z.B., methyl groups). |
| Cross-Linking Type | Physical cross-linking (via hydrogen bonding between hard segments); no chemical vulcanization needed. | Chemical cross-linking (requires vulcanizing agents like platinum catalysts or peroxides to form a 3D mesh). |
| Polarity | Medium-polar material (hydrogen bonds create intermolecular attraction). | Non-polar material (low surface energy; repels water and most solvents). |
| Molecular Flexibility | Hard segments (starr) and soft segments (flexibel) balance stiffness and elasticity. | Highly flexible Si–O bonds enable extreme deformation without breaking. |
Schlüsseleinfluss: Silicone’s non-polar, chemically cross-linked structure makes it resistant to extreme temperatures and chemicals, while TPU’s polar, physically cross-linked structure delivers superior mechanical strength for load-bearing applications.
2. Processing Technology & Herstellungseffizienz
How each material is molded and recycled directly affects production costs and scalability:
| Processing Trait | TPU | Silikon |
| Formmethode | Thermoplastisch: Compatible with standard plastic equipment (Injektionsformung, Extrusion, 3D Druck). Waste is recyclable (ground and reprocessed). | Thermoset: Requires vulcanization (flat vulcanizing machines for solid silicone; microinjection for liquid silicone). Waste is non-recyclable (cross-links are irreversible). |
| Temperaturbereich | Processing temp: 180° C - 220 ° C. (lower energy than silicone vulcanization). | Vulcanization temp: 120°C–180°C (solid silicone); 80°C–120°C (liquid silicone). Secondary vulcanization (200°C–250°C) may be needed for stability. |
| Zykluszeit | Schnell: 1–5 minutes per part (Ideal für die Produktion mit hoher Volumen, Z.B., phone cases via two-color co-extrusion). | Langsam: 5–15 minutes per part (plus secondary vulcanization time). Liquid silicone is faster (1–3 Minuten) but requires specialized tools. |
| Special Requirements | Additives needed for outdoor use (light stabilizers to prevent UV degradation). | Medical-grade silicone requires platinum catalysts (avoids peroxide residue). Solid silicone needs silica fillers for reinforcement. |
Beispiel für reale Welt: A smartphone manufacturer uses TPU for 100,000+ phone cases/month (fast extrusion, recyclable waste), while a medical device firm uses liquid silicone for 5,000 surgical catheter tips/month (precision microinjection, non-recyclable but biocompatible).
3. Mechanische Leistung: Stärke, Elastizität, and Durability
Mechanical properties determine which material works for structural vs. flexible applications:
| Mechanical Metric | TPU | Silikon |
| Zugfestigkeit | Hoch: 20MPa–40MPa (top grades rival engineering plastics). Suitable for gear belts, shoe midsoles. | Niedrig: 5MPa–8MPa (nur 1/5 of TPU’s strength). Not for load-bearing parts. |
| Tear Strength | Exzellent: Micro-phase separation prevents crack propagation. 3x stronger than silicone in right-angle incision tests (same thickness). | Arm: Molecular chain slippage causes stress concentration; tears easily under sharp impacts. |
| Dehnung in der Pause | 300%–600% (balances stretch and recovery for shock absorption). | 200%–800% (stretches further than TPU but with lower strength). |
| Compression Set | Mäßig: 15%–25% after 70 hours at 150°C (ASTM D395). May flatten over time in high-pressure seals. | Niedrig: ≤15% (high-performance grades ≤10%)—ideal for long-term seals (Z.B., Kfz -Dichtungen). |
| Ermüdungsleben | Gut: 100,000–500.000 Zyklen (strain amplitude ±50%). | Exzellent: 1,000,000+ Zyklen (outperforms most elastomers for dynamic applications like pump diaphragms). |
Critical Use Case: A fitness equipment maker chooses TPU for treadmill belt rollers (high tensile strength resists wear), while a HVAC manufacturer uses silicone for fan gaskets (low compression set maintains a tight seal for years).
4. Environmental Tolerance: Hitze, Chemikalien, and Aging
How each material withstands harsh conditions defines its suitability for extreme environments:
| Umweltfaktor | TPU | Silikon |
| Wärmewiderstand | Beschränkt: Long-term use ≤80°C; short-term ≤120°C (special formulas). Degrades above 150°C (yellows, becomes brittle). | Exzellent: Long-term use -60°C–250°C; short-term ≤300°C. Retains flexibility in freezing or boiling conditions. |
| Chemischer Widerstand | Variable: Aliphatic TPU swells in grease/oils; aromatic TPU resists solvents. Dissolves in strong acids (Z.B., Schwefelsäure). | Universal: Resists most chemicals (Fett, Öle, Lösungsmittel) außer starke Alkalis (Z.B., concentrated NaOH). No swelling in hydrocarbons. |
| Aging Mechanism | UV exposure causes yellowing and surface cracking; heat accelerates hardening. | UV/ozone causes gradual hardening (Sprödigkeit); heat has minimal impact. |
| Weatherability | Requires UV absorbers for outdoor use (Lebensdauer: 2–5 Jahre). | Inherently weather-resistant (Lebensdauer: 5–10 Jahre) without additives. |
Beispiel: A car manufacturer uses silicone for engine gaskets (withstands 220°C exhaust heat), while a shoe brand uses TPU for sneaker midsoles (adds UV stabilizers to prevent yellowing in sunlight).
5. Anwendungsszenarien: Which Material to Choose When?
Their unique traits make TPU and silicone irreplaceable in specific use cases. Below is a clear selection guide:
| Scenario Requirement | Choose TPU? | Choose Silicone? | Warum? |
| Tragende Teile | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | TPU’s high tensile strength (40MPA) supports weight (Z.B., gear belts, wheelchair tires). |
| High-Temperature Seals | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | Silicone’s -60°C–250°C range maintains elasticity in ovens/engines. |
| Biocompatible Devices | ❌ No (unless certified) | ✅ Yes | Silicone meets ISO 10993 (Z.B., artificial breast implants); TPU’s polar structure may leach chemicals. |
| 3D-Printed Prototypes | ✅ Yes | ❌ No (limited options) | TPU filaments are widely available for FDM printers; silicone 3D printing requires specialized resin. |
| Shock Absorption | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | Foamed TPU has 60%+ energy return (sneaker midsoles); silicone rebounds well but lacks strength. |
| High-Vacuum Sealing | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | Fluorosilicone silicone has leakage rates <1×10⁻⁹Pa·m³/s (spacecraft hatches). |
Industriebeispiel: A medical device company uses silicone for surgical gloves (Biokompatibel, Hitzesterilisierbar), while a sports brand uses TPU for yoga mat grips (Schockabsorben, printable in custom colors).
6. Practical Identification Methods: How to Tell Them Apart
Use these quick tests to distinguish TPU from silicone without specialized equipment:
| Test Method | TPU Reaction | Silicone Reaction |
| Combustion Test | Burns with blue flame; melts and drips; residue is black carbonized block. | Self-extinguishes; produces white smoke; residue is white powdered silica. |
| Solvent Test | Immersed in acetone: Surface swells, wrinkles, and softens (weight increases by 5%–10%). | Immersed in acetone: Keine Änderung (weight variation <1%); surface remains smooth. |
| Hardness Test | Shore A 70–90 (firm, like a rubber eraser); Shore D 30–50 for rigid grades. | Shore A 20–60 (weich, wie ein Stresstball); no Shore D grades (too flexible). |
| Rebound Test | Steel ball (10G) dropped from 10cm rebounds 3–5cm (lower resilience). | Steel ball rebounds 6–8cm (higher resilience, even at low hardness). |
7. Yigu Technology’s Perspective on TPU vs. Silikon
Bei Yigu Technology, we’ve resolved countless material mismatches—e.g., a client used TPU for oven seals (melted at 180°C) or silicone for industrial gear belts (teared under load). Our key advice: Priorisieren Umweltbedingungen Und mechanical needs over cost. Für hochvolumige, tragende Teile (Z.B., 100k+ phone cases), TPU’s recyclability and fast cycles save 30% on manufacturing costs. Für kritische Anwendungen (Z.B., Medizinische Implantate, spacecraft seals), silicone’s biocompatibility and temperature resistance are non-negotiable—even with 2x higher costs. We also recommend testing: For outdoor products, expose TPU/silicone to 1,000 hours of UV light to check aging; for seals, run compression set tests at your maximum operating temperature. The right material isn’t just about performance—it’s about long-term reliability.
8. FAQ: Common Questions About TPU and Silicone
Q1: Can TPU be used as a substitute for silicone in medical devices?
A1: Only for non-implantable, low-risk devices (Z.B., external sensor housings). Implantierbare Geräte (Z.B., breast implants) require silicone—TPU may leach chemicals (even certified grades) and lacks silicone’s long-term biostability. Always verify ISO 10993 Einhaltung; silicone meets this standard for implants, while TPU rarely does.
Q2: Which material is better for outdoor products (Z.B., garden hoses, Terrassenmöbel)?
A2: It depends on the product’s function. For flexible hoses (needs chemical resistance to water/garden chemicals), choose silicone (Keine Schwellung, 5–10 year weather life). For rigid furniture parts (Benötigt Einflussresistenz), choose TPU (add UV stabilizers) — it’s stronger than silicone and cheaper for high-volume production.
Q3: Is silicone more expensive than TPU?
A3: Raw material costs are similar (\(3- )8/kg), but silicone’s total manufacturing cost is 1.5–2x higher. This is due to slower vulcanization cycles, non-recyclable waste, and specialized equipment (Z.B., liquid silicone injection machines). TPU’s faster cycles and recyclable waste make it cheaper for high-volume projects; silicone is cost-effective only for low-volume, Hochleistungsanwendungen.