FDM (Schmelzauftragsformen) und SLA (Lichthärtendes Formen) are two mainstream 3D printing technologies, Jedes ist auf unterschiedliche Projektanforderungen zugeschnitten – eines für kostengünstige Funktionsteile und das andere für hohe Präzision, detaillierte Modelle. Das Verständnis ihrer Unterschiede ist entscheidend für die Auswahl des richtigen Prozesses, ob Sie mechanische Prototypen herstellen, medizinische Modelle, oder Ausstellungsstücke. Dieser Artikel schlüsselt die auf core differences between FDM and SLA printing processes across 6 key areas, plus practical guidance on when to use each.
1. Core Difference: Working Principle (Material Extrusion vs. Resin Curing)
The fundamental divide between FDM and SLA lies in how they build parts—a contrast that shapes every other aspect of their performance, from material options to surface quality.
| Verfahren | Working Principle | Wie es funktioniert | Simple Analogy |
| FDM (Schmelzauftragsformen) | Thermoplastische Extrusion | Uses a heated nozzle to melt thermoplastic materials (z.B., PLA, ABS). The nozzle moves along a preset 3D model path, depositing molten material layer by layer on a build platform. The material cools and solidifies quickly to form the final part. | Squeezing toothpaste from a tube: The heated nozzle acts like a toothpaste tube, extruding material in controlled lines to build a shape layer by layer. |
| SLA (Lichthärtendes Formen) | UV Light Resin Curing | Uses a UV laser or light source to cure liquid photosensitive resin. The light source precisely targets and hardens specific areas of the resin surface according to slice data. The build platform gradually lifts to create space for the next layer, repeating until the part is complete. | Hardening gel with sunlight: The liquid resin is like UV-sensitive gel, which solidifies into a solid shape when exposed to targeted UV light. |
2. Side-by-Side Comparison: FDM vs. SLA Printing Processes
To quickly evaluate which process fits your needs, use this comprehensive table comparing their materials, Genauigkeit, kosten, und mehr.
| Comparison Category | FDM (Schmelzauftragsformen) | SLA (Lichthärtendes Formen) | Key Takeaway |
| Materialeigenschaften | – Typen: Supports a wide range of thermoplastics (PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU) and mixed materials (carbon fiber-filled, wood-filled).- Kosten: Low consumable cost (um \(12–)15/kg).- Mechanische Festigkeit: Hohe Festigkeit; suitable for functional parts, but anisotropic (weak interlayer bonding). | – Typen: Limited to photosensitive resins (Standard, hohe Temperatur, biokompatibel); few color options.- Kosten: High resin cost (um \(75–)120/liter); frequent replacement of consumables (LCD screens, resin tanks) adds expense.- Mechanische Festigkeit: Spröde (ordinary resin); not ideal for mechanical stress, but engineering-grade resin improves durability. | FDM offers diverse, low-cost materials; SLA uses specialized resins for precision, not strength. |
| Genauigkeit & Oberflächenqualität | – Genauigkeit: Layer thickness ranges from 0.05–0.3mm, limited by nozzle size and movement precision. Tolerances are relatively loose (±0,1–0,3 mm).- Oberflächenqualität: Obvious layer lines; rough surface needs sanding or chemical polishing to improve. Complex details (dünne Wände, sharp edges) often blur. | – Genauigkeit: Layer thickness as low as 0.02–0.05mm; laser/projection resolution reaches micron level. Tolerances are tight (±0.025mm).- Oberflächenqualität: Glatt, delicate finish (close to injection-molded parts); no additional sanding needed. Complex details and small features are clearly preserved. | SLA delivers industrial-grade precision and surface quality; FDM prioritizes functionality over finesse. |
| Ausrüstung & Operating Costs | – Equipment Price: Entry-level models cost as low as \(150–)300; industrial-grade equipment is moderately priced (\(5,000–)50,000). Easy to maintain. – Operating Costs: Low replacement costs for consumables (Filamente, Düsen); no extra tools required for basic use. | – Equipment Price: Desktop models cost \(1,000–)5,000; industrial-grade equipment is expensive (\(20,000–)1,000,000+). Light sources and LCD screens wear out quickly. – Operating Costs: High additional expenses (Harze, isopropyl alcohol for cleaning, post-curing equipment); resin tanks need regular replacement. | FDM is budget-friendly for long-term use; SLA requires higher upfront and ongoing investment. |
| Production Speed | – Geschwindigkeit: Faster for large, einfache Teile. A 10cm cubic PLA part takes 2–4 hours. – Limitation: Speed decreases with complex geometries (due to frequent nozzle movement changes). | – Geschwindigkeit: Slower for most parts. A 10cm cubic resin part takes 3–6 hours (due to precise light targeting). – Limitation: Speed is less affected by complexity but tied to layer count (more layers = longer time). | FDM is faster for large, simple functional parts; SLA is slower but consistent for detailed models. |
| Post-Treatment Requirements | – Schritte: Manual removal of support structures; Schleifen, filing, or chemical polishing to smooth layer lines. Process is simple but time-consuming. – Safety: No toxic materials; no special protective gear needed (except when handling ABS, which emits mild fumes). | – Schritte: Rinse with isopropyl alcohol to remove residual resin; post-UV curing to enhance part strength. Must wear protective gloves to avoid skin contact with resin. – Waste Disposal: Need to handle waste resin and cleaning liquid carefully to ensure environmental protection. | FDM post-treatment is labor-intensive but safe; SLA post-treatment is more technical and requires safety precautions. |
| Application Scenarios | – Ideal Uses: Funktionsprototypen (mechanische Komponenten), Bildungsmodelle, large-size parts (auto parts), low-cost low-volume production. – Vorteile: Diverse materials, langlebige Teile, suitable for outdoor or high-durability needs. | – Ideal Uses: High-precision models (Zahnkronen, Schmuck), medizinische Implantate, komplexe Geometrien (intricate sculptures), transparent or dense components. – Vorteile: Excellent surface finish, isotropy (consistent strength in all directions), suitable for display or mold making with strict detail requirements. | FDM serves functional, cost-sensitive projects; SLA dominates precision and detail-focused applications. |
3. When to Choose FDM vs. SLA Printing Process? (Schritt-für-Schritt-Anleitung)
Use this linear, question-driven process to align the process with your project goals:
Schritt 1: Define Budget & Cost Priorities
- Tight budget or low-cost needs: Wählen FDM. Zum Beispiel, wenn Sie brauchen 50 PLA mechanical prototypes, FDM’s low filament cost (\(12–)15/kg) keeps total expenses down.
- Willing to invest in precision: Wählen SLA. Zum Beispiel, dental models requiring ±0.025mm tolerance justify SLA’s higher resin and equipment costs.
Schritt 2: Evaluate Part Function & Strength Needs
- Functional parts or mechanical components: Verwenden FDM. Its thermoplastics (z.B., ABS, PETG) have high strength, making them suitable for parts that need to withstand stress (z.B., robot arms, Werkzeuggriffe).
- Non-functional display models or precision parts: Verwenden SLA. Its smooth finish and detail preservation work for items like jewelry prototypes or medical teaching models.
Schritt 3: Consider Timeline & Post-Treatment Effort
- Fast turnaround or minimal post-treatment time: Entscheiden Sie sich für SLA if precision is key (no sanding needed). Wählen FDM if you can accept sanding to save cost (FDM prints faster for large parts).
- Complex details or tight tolerances: Prioritize SLA (z.B., small thin walls <0.5mm). For simple shapes (z.B., large storage bins), FDM is more efficient.
4. Yigu Technology’s Perspective on FDM vs. SLA Printing Processes
Bei Yigu Technology, we see FDM and SLA as complementary, not competitive. Many clients mistakenly choose SLA for functional parts (wasting money on brittle resin) or FDM for high-precision models (compromising detail). We recommend combining both: Verwenden SLA for initial prototyping (to validate design details and surface quality) Und FDM for functional testing or mass production (to leverage durable, low-cost thermoplastics). For clients with mixed needs (z.B., a part needing both detail and strength), we also offer hybrid solutions—using SLA for detailed components and FDM for structural parts, then assembling them. This approach balances precision, kosten, und Funktionalität, ensuring every project meets its goals without unnecessary trade-offs.
FAQ: Common Questions About FDM and SLA Printing Processes
- Q: Can FDM produce parts with the same surface quality as SLA?
A: NEIN. Even with extensive post-processing (Schleifen, Polieren), FDM parts still have subtle layer lines. SLA’s resin curing process creates a naturally smooth surface that FDM cannot match—making SLA better for display or precision-critical parts.
- Q: Is SLA resin safe to use, especially for medical or food-contact parts?
A: Ordinary SLA resin is not safe for food contact (it may leach chemicals). Jedoch, biocompatible SLA resin (Von der FDA zugelassen) is suitable for medical parts (z.B., Zahnmodelle, temporäre Implantate). Always check resin specifications—never use standard resin for food or medical applications.
- Q: Which process is better for large-size parts (z.B., 50cm+ auto components)?
A: FDM is better. SLA build platforms are typically smaller (most desktop models <30cm), and large SLA parts require more resin (increasing cost) and longer curing times. FDM has larger build volumes and lower material costs, making it more practical for large-size functional parts.